 No term must be distributed in the conclusion which was not distributed in one of the premises. 5. From negative premises nothing can be inferred. 6. If one premise be negative, the conclusion must be negative ; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion...  Hindu Logic as Preserved in China and Japan - Page 51by Sadajiro Sugiura - 1900 - 114 pagesFull view - About this book
 | Charles Wesley - 1832 - 164 pages
...the other extreme; therefore, the extremes disagreeing with each other, the conclusion is negative. To prove a negative conclusion, one of the premises must be negative. f " animals." The conclusion again is A, and does distribute the subject, "animals." * In order to... | |
 | William Stanley Jevons - 1870 - 420 pages
...which was not distributed in one of the premises. 5. From negative premises nothing can be inferred. 6. •• If one premise be negative, the conclusion must be negative; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. From the above rules... | |
 | William Stanley Jevons - 1879 - 364 pages
...which was not distributed in one of the premises. 5. From negative premises nothing can be inferred. 6. If one premise be negative, the conclusion must be negative; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. From the above rules... | |
 | William Stanley Jevons - 1880 - 370 pages
...of the premises. (6) If one premise be negative, the conclusion must be negative ; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. From the above rules may be deduced two subordinate rules, which it will nevertheless be convenient... | |
 | William Stanley Jevons - 1881 - 364 pages
...which was not distributed in one of the premises. 5. From negative premises nothing can be inferred. 6. If one premise be negative, the conclusion must be negative; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. From the above rules... | |
 | William Stanley Jevons - 1896 - 344 pages
...middle term must be distribttted once at least. (5) From negative premises nothing can be inferred. (6) If one premise be negative, the conclusion must be negative ; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. From the above rules... | |
 | William Stanley Jevons - 1896 - 344 pages
...can be inferred. (6) If one premise be negative, the conclusion must be negative ; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. From the above rules may be deduced two subordinate rules, which it will nevertheless be convenient... | |
 | James Edwin Creighton - 1898 - 418 pages
...which was not distributed in one of the premises. (5) From negative premises nothing can be inferred. (6) If one premise be negative, the conclusion must...negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. As a consequence of the above rules there result two additional canons which may be set down here.... | |
 | Elias J. MacEwan - 1898 - 440 pages
...which was not distributed in one of the premises. 5. From negative premises nothing can be inferred. 6. If one premise be negative, the conclusion must be negative ; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. From the above rules... | |
 | Elias J. MacEwan - 1898 - 440 pages
...can be inferred. 6. If one premise be negative, the conclusions must be negative ; and vice versa, to prove a negative conclusion one of the premises must be negative. From the above rules may be deduced two subordinate rules, which it will be convenient to state at... | |
| |
